bacnet:project_management:btl_wg
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| bacnet:project_management:btl_wg [2012/05/08 17:16] – created desolat | bacnet:project_management:btl_wg [2019/12/18 16:00] (current) – ↷ Page moved from tools:bacnet:project_management:btl_wg to bacnet:project_management:btl_wg desolat | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| * Implementation Guidelines | * Implementation Guidelines | ||
| + | ===== Issue Management ===== | ||
| + | * {{: | ||
| + | * " | ||
| + | * documents can be referenced in corresponding issues is a seperate field (hyperlink to document storage (SVN, GoogleDocs, ...) | ||
| + | * :?: Why should addenda be necessary? Why not collect changes (addenda, errata) into a minor version Test Package (e.g. 9.1, ...), which is released regularly? | ||
| + | * " | ||
| + | * :!: BTL-WG Meeting Minutes 2011-11-14 2c: efficiency improvement discussion | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Analysis ===== | ||
| + | * Why are not all files on the FTP? | ||
| + | * most current work item files | ||
| + | * e.g. wID0044 | ||
| + | * most current draft test plan and test definitions | ||
| + | * e.g. TP9.0c-5 | ||
| + | * Where can one find out what work items made it into which test package version? | ||
| + | * work-to-do: ACCEPTED and " | ||
| + | * Why do we not keep the most current work-to-do in one place on the FTP? | ||
bacnet/project_management/btl_wg.1336490188.txt.gz · Last modified: (external edit)
